Showing posts with label police. Show all posts
Showing posts with label police. Show all posts

Film showing evidence in Harry´s case

2:41 PM Add Comment


This film was made by Harry´s attorney, Mr James Sterling Lawrence, depicting the truth about the lay out of the house in which Al was killed in 1985. Police say Harry could not be seen coming up the stairs by the witness in the room upstairs while the shooting took place in the room next to hers. Police lied in court about this evidence. The judge refused the jury to see for them selves.
Can you see someone coming up the stairs from the room of Evelyn Schneider?

Here are photos:


First is the view from the bed of Evelyn Schneider. A person must cross the hallway in front of her door to get to where Iwuagwu was killed. Mrs. Schneider was certain that Harry came up the stairs after the shooting.


CAN YOU SEE A PERSON COMING UP THE STAIRSAND CROSSING IN FRONT OF YOU?













Next is the view into the room. To get to the room where the shooting took place, one goes up the stairs at the right of the photo (you see railing only), then turn left, walk past Mrs. Schneider's room directly into another room. Turn right to get to the room where Mr. Iwuagwu was killed.












COULD SOMEONE IN THAT BED SEE YOU?


Next is a diagram of the top floor of the house. Officers swore that Mrs. Schneider could not have seen Harry Bout as he came up the stairs and crossed to where the shots had been fired.



SHOULD A JURY BE ALLOWED TO GO AND SEE THE ACTUAL LAYOUT BEFORE DECIDING BOUT COULD NOT BE SEEN FROM THE BED?

Factual outline

2:34 PM Add Comment
Factual outline
A factual outline, explaining how the photographic evidence proves the police lied to frame an innocent person.

The autopsy of the deceased revealed that he had been shot 3 times in the head at point-blank range with a 32 calibre pistol. The coroner's report indicated that the victim would have dropped dead instantly on the spot where he had been shot after entry of the first bullet.

The only eyewitness not involved in the crime (Evelyn Schneider) had been questioned by the police. Schneider told the police: she was in her bedroom (the bedroom immediately next to the bedroom where the killing took place) when she heard 3 gunshots and looked out of her room to see Harry Bout racing up the stairway carrying a long shotgun.

The police department forensic crime scene technicians thoroughly inspected the crime scene looking for evidence of a shotgun discharge having gone off in the house, AND FOUND NONE. The technicians also removed carpeting from the bedroom where the victim had been shot (Note: blood stains had been found on the carpet backing) to show that the victim had been shot in the bedroom, not on or anywhere near the stairway.

From the evidence the police and prosecutor knew that the gunshots Schneider had heard, came from a 32 calibre pistol, not a shotgun; and that Bout could not have committed the crime while on the stairway when the 3 fatal gunshots were heard.

The police also knew from Dawn Bean's own admissions that she was in the bedroom with the victim. Bean had originally been charged with premeditated first degree murder until the prosecutor made a deal with her to put blame on Bout, which Bean gladly accepted.

At Bout's trial the police had to lie and commit perjury to discredit Schneider's testimony. The police testified it would have been impossible for Schneider to have seen Bout racing up the stairway, and submitted a false diagram of the house showing a wall extending into the way of Schneider's view.

The police also lied that Schneider's bedroom door opened inward instead of outward to make it look as though the door would also have blocked her view. The video and photos that can be seen on this website of Attorney James S. Lawrence factually prove that Schneider told the truth about what she could see and conclusively proves that the police lied under oath and even submitted a falsified diagram.

Anyone willing to compare the photographic evidence to the recorded and transcribed testimony of the police officers is invited to do so and see the proof that an innocent man is presently languishing in prison for a crime the police and prosecutor's office know he could not have committed.